Hi,

On Friday, 25 of March 2005 01:49, you wrote:
]--snip--[
> > > I actually added such calls in uhci, ehci and yenta. It's ok for S3 (and
> > > definitely required for S3). Unclear if it's ok for S4, so please try
> > > revert the patch.
> > 
> > 2.6.11-rc1-mm1 with the patch reverted works fine. :-)
> So just remove the pci_enable/disable_device call in the driver makes
> the system work?

I'm a bit confused. :-)  I'm not sure if the patch that I have reverted is 
related
to pci_enable/disable_device.  It's this one:

diff -Naru a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c   2005-03-24 04:57:27 -08:00
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c   2005-03-24 04:57:27 -08:00
@@ -72,10 +72,12 @@
        u8                      active;                 /* Current IRQ */
        u8                      edge_level;             /* All IRQs */
        u8                      active_high_low;        /* All IRQs */
-       u8                      initialized;
        u8                      resource_type;
        u8                      possible_count;
        u8                      possible[ACPI_PCI_LINK_MAX_POSSIBLE];
+       u8                      initialized:1;
+       u8                      suspend_resume:1;
+       u8                      reserved:6;
 };
 
 struct acpi_pci_link {
@@ -530,6 +532,10 @@
 
        ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_pci_link_allocate");
 
+       if (link->irq.suspend_resume) {
+               acpi_pci_link_set(link, link->irq.active);
+               link->irq.suspend_resume = 0;
+       }
        if (link->irq.initialized)
                return_VALUE(0);
 
@@ -713,38 +719,24 @@
        return_VALUE(result);
 }
 
-
-static int
-acpi_pci_link_resume (
-       struct acpi_pci_link    *link)
-{
-       ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_pci_link_resume");
-       
-       if (link->irq.active && link->irq.initialized)
-               return_VALUE(acpi_pci_link_set(link, link->irq.active));
-       else
-               return_VALUE(0);
-}
-
-
 static int
-irqrouter_resume(
-       struct sys_device *dev)
+irqrouter_suspend(
+       struct sys_device *dev,
+       u32     state)
 {
        struct list_head        *node = NULL;
        struct acpi_pci_link    *link = NULL;
 
-       ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("irqrouter_resume");
+       ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("irqrouter_suspend");
 
        list_for_each(node, &acpi_link.entries) {
-
                link = list_entry(node, struct acpi_pci_link, node);
                if (!link) {
                        ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, "Invalid link 
context\n"));
                        continue;
                }
-
-               acpi_pci_link_resume(link);
+               if (link->irq.active && link->irq.initialized)
+                       link->irq.suspend_resume = 1;
        }
        return_VALUE(0);
 }
@@ -856,7 +848,7 @@
 
 static struct sysdev_class irqrouter_sysdev_class = {
         set_kset_name("irqrouter"),
-        .resume = irqrouter_resume,
+        .suspend = irqrouter_suspend,
 };


Greets,
Rafael 


-- 
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
                -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to