(please keep me on CC)

kfree() handles NULL fine, to check is redundant.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3-orig/fs/ext2/acl.c     2005-03-02 08:38:18.000000000 
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1-mm3/fs/ext2/acl.c  2005-03-25 22:41:07.000000000 +0100
@@ -194,8 +194,7 @@ ext2_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty
                acl = NULL;
        else
                acl = ERR_PTR(retval);
-       if (value)
-               kfree(value);
+       kfree(value);
 
        if (!IS_ERR(acl)) {
                switch(type) {
@@ -262,8 +261,7 @@ ext2_set_acl(struct inode *inode, int ty
 
        error = ext2_xattr_set(inode, name_index, "", value, size, 0);
 
-       if (value)
-               kfree(value);
+       kfree(value);
        if (!error) {
                switch(type) {
                        case ACL_TYPE_ACCESS:


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to