On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:31:35AM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote: > Warn seems necessary because we unconditionally change > the pin behavior, I didn't meet any case where direct irq is truly > used on our platform. But maybe it could happen? > Don't want to cause any hidden regression.
The datasheet says """ This bit should be cleared if io access mode is selected for this pad """ If I interpret it right, it means that whenever this pad is functioning as a GPIO the flag should be cleared. That's precisely the case here. > Moreover if it is confirmed that is an hardware issue (BIOS), > We can just keep this patch locally as a workaround and revert > it later once our BIOS fixed. True but only if there aren't any machines out there with this flaw in the BIOS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/