On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 17:35 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 19.09.2014 17:29, schrieb Jeff Kirsher: > > From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com> > > > > Silence nested-externs warnings for these, as these nested > > externs are truly wanted. > > > > CC: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > > CC: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> > > CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> > > CC: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > > CC: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rus...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> > > --- > > include/linux/signal.h | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/signal.h b/include/linux/signal.h > > index 750196f..e68ae6b 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/signal.h > > +++ b/include/linux/signal.h > > @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ static inline int sigismember(sigset_t *set, int _sig) > > > > static inline int sigisemptyset(sigset_t *set) > > { > > + DIAG_PUSH DIAG_IGNORE(nested-externs) > > Do we really want to clutter the source with such tags? > Does this even build? i.e. how does gcc know to ignore that? > > rw@azrael:~/linux (ubi-wlcrash $)> git grep DIAG_PUSH | wc -l > 0 > > Thanks, > //richard
See patch 1 of the series.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part