From: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>

3.4.104-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

commit 9b29d3c6510407d91786c1cf9183ff4debb3473a upstream.

When multiple devices are detached in __detach_device, they
are also removed from the domains dev_list. This makes it
unsafe to use list_for_each_entry_safe, as the next pointer
might also not be in the list anymore after __detach_device
returns. So just repeatedly remove the first element of the
list until it is empty.

Tested-by: Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroe...@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index c0536ed..a55353c3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -3028,14 +3028,16 @@ free_domains:
 
 static void cleanup_domain(struct protection_domain *domain)
 {
-       struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data, *next;
+       struct iommu_dev_data *entry;
        unsigned long flags;
 
        write_lock_irqsave(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
 
-       list_for_each_entry_safe(dev_data, next, &domain->dev_list, list) {
-               __detach_device(dev_data);
-               atomic_set(&dev_data->bind, 0);
+       while (!list_empty(&domain->dev_list)) {
+               entry = list_first_entry(&domain->dev_list,
+                                        struct iommu_dev_data, list);
+               __detach_device(entry);
+               atomic_set(&entry->bind, 0);
        }
 
        write_unlock_irqrestore(&amd_iommu_devtable_lock, flags);
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to