From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
3.4.104-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
commit 7ba3ec5749ddb61f79f7be17b5fd7720eebc52de upstream.
Commit 8e3dffc651cb "Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function
dquot_free_block_nodirty is called" unveiled a bug in __ext2_get_block()
called from ext2_get_xip_mem(). That function called ext2_get_block()
mistakenly asking it to map 0 blocks while 1 was intended. Before the
above mentioned commit things worked out fine by luck but after that commit
we started returning that we allocated 0 blocks while we in fact
allocated 1 block and thus allocation was looping until all blocks in
the filesystem were exhausted.
Fix the problem by properly asking for one block and also add assertion
in ext2_get_blocks() to catch similar problems.
Reported-and-tested-by: Andiry Xu <andiry...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangn...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lize...@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 ++
fs/ext2/xip.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c
index 740cad8..6a7c483 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c
@@ -614,6 +614,8 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode,
int count = 0;
ext2_fsblk_t first_block = 0;
+ BUG_ON(maxblocks == 0);
+
depth = ext2_block_to_path(inode,iblock,offsets,&blocks_to_boundary);
if (depth == 0)
diff --git a/fs/ext2/xip.c b/fs/ext2/xip.c
index 1c33128..e98171a 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/xip.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/xip.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ __ext2_get_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t pgoff, int
create,
int rc;
memset(&tmp, 0, sizeof(struct buffer_head));
+ tmp.b_size = 1 << inode->i_blkbits;
rc = ext2_get_block(inode, pgoff, &tmp, create);
*result = tmp.b_blocknr;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
