On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:01:20AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h: In function ‘io_apic_modify’:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h:223:48: warning: declaration of ‘apic’ 
> shadows a global declaration [-Wshadow]
>  static inline void io_apic_modify(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg, 
> unsigned int value)
>                                                 ^
> In file included from ./arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h:12:0,
>                  from include/linux/smp.h:59,
>                  from include/linux/topology.h:33,
>                  from include/linux/gfp.h:8,
>                  from include/linux/kmod.h:22,
>                  from include/linux/module.h:13,
>                  from drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h:65,
>                  from drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c:1:
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:366:21: warning: shadowed declaration is here 
> [-Wshadow]
>  extern struct apic *apic;
>                      ^
> 
> So gcc complains that an unsigned int shadows a struct apic pointer.

Here, I think the right fix involves picking a more descriptive name
than "apic" for the global varible.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to