On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 08:05:13PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2005, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Andi Kleen: > > > > preempt_schedule_irq is not an i386 specific function and seems to take > > > special care of BKL preemption and since reiserfs does use the BKL to do > > > certain things I think this actually might be the problem...? > > > > Hmm, preempt_schedule_irq is not in mainline as far as I can see. > > My patches are always for mainline; i dont do a special > > patch kit for -mm* > > PREEMPT_BKL has been in mainline since 2.6.11-rc1, preempt_schedule_irq > made it in 2.6.11-rc3. Please look here: > http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/search/?expr=preempt_schedule_irq&search=ChangeSet+comments
Hmm, true. I must have missed it with the last merge. Looking at the changeset your simple patch is probably ok. > > Now that I looked into it I think that it's obviously the correct > solution. Agreed. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/