On Tuesday 23 September 2014 15:55:08 beh...@converseincode.com wrote:
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-bcm-kona.c
> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_pltfm_data_kona = {
>                 SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN,
>  };
>  
> -static struct __initconst of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = {
> +static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = {
>         { .compatible = "brcm,kona-sdhci"},
>         { .compatible = "bcm,kona-sdhci"}, /* deprecated name */
>         {}
> 

Sorry for giving you trouble over such a simple patch (especially
one that I have acked already), but I just noticed that this is
not following the common style we use in the kernel.

Almost everywhere in Linux, we use

static const struct of_device_id sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = {

not

static struct of_device_id const sdhci_bcm_kona_of_match[] = {

AFAICT they behave in identical ways, but the first one seems
easier to read for someone familiar with kernel code.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to