On 09/15/2014 04:31 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:31:29AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:08 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index f86023b..51e0d13 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -740,9 +740,15 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone,
        if (nr_scanned)
                __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_PAGES_SCANNED, -nr_scanned);

+       if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
+               migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
+               if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
+                       goto skip_counting;
+       }
+       __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
+
+skip_counting:

Here, wouldn't a simple 'else __mod_zone_freepage_state...' look
better than goto + label? (same for the following 2 patches). Or
does that generate worse code?

To remove goto label, we need two __mod_zone_freepage_state() like
as below. On my system, it doesn't generate worse code, but, I am not
sure that this is true if more logic would be added. I think that
goto + label is better.

Oh right, I missed that. It's a bit subtle, but I don't see a nicer solution right now.

+       if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
+               migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
+               if (!is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
+                       __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, 
migratetype);
+       } else {
+               __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
         }


Yeah that would be uglier I guess.

Anyway, What do you think which one is better, either v2 or v3? Still, v3? :)

Yeah v3 is much better than v1 was, and better for backporting than v2. The changelogs also look quite clear. The overhead shouldn't be bad with the per-zone flag guarding get_pfnblock_migratetype.

I'm just not sure about patch 4 and potentially leaving unmerged budies behind. How would it look if instead we made sure isolation works on whole MAX_ORDER blocks instead?

Vlastimil

Thanks.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to