From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

Return proper error value for linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH) without enough
privileges.

I guess ENOENT was used here, because without AT_EMPTY_PATH that's what
we'd return for an empty path.  But it is wrong for AT_EMPTY_PATH, since we
might not even be passing an empty path, we are simply complaining about
lack of privs for which EPERM is the proper error.

Fixes: 11a7b371b64e ("fs: allow AT_EMPTY_PATH in linkat()...")
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # 2.6.39+
---
 fs/namei.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3957,7 +3957,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(linkat, int, olddfd, con
         */
        if (flags & AT_EMPTY_PATH) {
                if (!capable(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH))
-                       return -ENOENT;
+                       return -EPERM;
                how = LOOKUP_EMPTY;
        }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to