On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:54:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2014-09-24 21:44:51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > From: Subhransu S. Prusty <subhransu.s.pru...@intel.com>
> >
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend are used together
> > in quite a lot of places. Add a helper for these.
> > Also updated Documentation for this
>
> With function name as long as the implementation... I'm not sure if
> this is good helper :-).
am all ears if that is a general consensus to cut down on length and
suggestions welcome :)
--
~Vinod
> Pavel
>
> > +static inline int pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > + return pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> > +}
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures)
> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
