On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't get it. Why isn't this patch acceptable, at least on x86-64
> where NT is never valid?
Why do you think it's not acceptable? Why do you raise a stink *one*
day after the patch - that seems to not be very important - is sent
out?
Why would SIGSEGV even be that bad? The program does crap things, why
accept it silently?
I don't think the patch is necessarily wrong, but I don't see why it
would be critical, and I *definitely* don't see why the f*ck you are
making a big deal of it.
Go away, stop bothering people.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
