On 29/09/14 23:17, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 09/29/14 02:14, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:@@ -246,6 +247,24 @@ #reset-cells = <1>; }; + apcs: syscon@2011000 { + compatible = "syscon"; + reg = <0x2011000 0x1000>; + };This is actually a clock controller block that hw designers decided was good place to shove the ipc bits (because there's room!). Can we call it l2cc: clock-controller@2011000 { compatible = "syscon"; reg = <0x2011000 0x1000>; };
yep, I will rename this in next version.
Eventually I'll add the specific krait compatible when we merge krait clock support:
sounds good. --srini
l2cc: clock-controller@2011000 { compatible = "qcom,kpss-gcc", "syscon"; reg = <0x2011000 0x1000>; clock-output-names = "acpu_l2_aux"; };+ + rpm@108000 { + compatible = "qcom,rpm-apq8064"; + reg = <0x108000 0x1000>; + qcom,ipc = <&apcs 0x8 2>;There are actually 3 ipc bits. I guess if we ever have to use the other two we'll extend this binding to have the other bits specified some other way?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
