On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:39:13PM +0300, Stefan Kristiansson wrote:
> The correct type (SSM2602/SSM2603/SSM2604) is passed down
> from the ssm2602_spi_probe()/ssm2602_spi_probe() functions,
> so use that instead of hardcoding it to SSM2602 in
> ssm2602_probe().

Applied all, thanks.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to