On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:03:06PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > What kind of CPU is the problematic machine? There was some
> > question about just how architectural the whole "TLB entry causing
> > a page fault gets invalidated automatically" really is.
>
> Intel people told me at the time that the guarantee was architectural.
> I don't know whether other x86 manufacturers know this...
>
> Doing a local tlb flush from ptep_set_access_flags seems appropriate,
> if that is indeed the issue.
>
> On the other hand, do_wp_page does not seem to do a tlb flush when
> the old page is reused, so CPUs do get rid of inappropriate TLB
> entries. We would have noticed do_wp_page not working right :)
The puzzling thing is we've had that code change for two years
without issue. This isn't a new machine, so why would it only
be showing up bad effects now ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
