On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:20:43AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Allow the driver to probe from ACPI namespace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpio_ke
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpio_keys_polled_of_match);
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match[] = {
> + { "PRP0001" }, /* Device Tree shoehorned into ACPI */
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match);
> +
> static int gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -309,6 +315,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_keys_
> .name = DRV_NAME,
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .of_match_table = gpio_keys_polled_of_match,
> + .acpi_match_table = gpio_keys_polled_acpi_match,
o
Hmm, why do we need the generic "PRP0001" in every driver? The ACPI device
should have PRP0001 and ACPI bus should know to look into OF matching table
for such devices.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
