On 01/10/14 09:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 01/10/14 01:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On the substance.
I'm certainly not trying to antagonise you here - I assumed you were
*suggesting* to apply those comments directly ?
Which is why I updated the sent patches with your comments - since they
seemed more descriptive anyway - and sent back to the list.
That part is fine. What really annoyed me is the patch:
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Call identify_cpu() unconditionally once remove other
callsites
which is a complete fail in all aspects. You should be able to figure
that out yourself easily:
Read the reviews of "[PATCH 1/3] x86: Bugfix bit-rot in the calling of
legacy_cache_size" again carefully. Then look at your patch, the
subject line and the changelog. It should be pretty obvious.
OK - I'll read again.
Thanks for the reviews
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
