On 10/01/2014 10:50 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 09/30/2014 04:21 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
>>> If we ever want those cycles back, I bet that the compat sysenter path
>>> could be trimmed down a lot. For example, I think that all of the
>>> zero-extension stuff is unnecessary now that we have the magic syscall
>>> wrappers for all (?) syscalls.
>>
>> Emphasis on "(?)". So yes, once we verified that ....
>>
>
> I don't think that's true. Many system calls use exactly the same entry
> point for compat and noncompat calls. I don't see any value in
> replicating that code in every system call.
>
> The only time we need to do anything horribly special is when we have an
> argument which is a signed long, which fortunately is not at all common.
>
Also, we still need to shuffle registers around to match the x86-64
calling convention. Zero extension as part of that shuffle is free.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
