3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

commit 4d4048be8a93769350efa31d2482a038b7de73d0 upstream.

find_lock_task_mm() expects it is called under rcu or tasklist lock, but
it seems that at least oom_unkillable_task()->task_in_mem_cgroup() and
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()->oom_badness() can call it lockless.

Perhaps we could fix the callers, but this patch simply adds rcu lock
into find_lock_task_mm().  This also allows to simplify a bit one of its
callers, oom_kill_process().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergey Dyasly <[email protected]>
Cc: Sameer Nanda <[email protected]>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ma, Xindong" <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: "Tu, Xiaobing" <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 mm/oom_kill.c |   12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -102,14 +102,19 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(st
 {
        struct task_struct *t;
 
+       rcu_read_lock();
+
        for_each_thread(p, t) {
                task_lock(t);
                if (likely(t->mm))
-                       return t;
+                       goto found;
                task_unlock(t);
        }
+       t = NULL;
+found:
+       rcu_read_unlock();
 
-       return NULL;
+       return t;
 }
 
 /* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
@@ -461,10 +466,8 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
        }
        read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 
-       rcu_read_lock();
        p = find_lock_task_mm(victim);
        if (!p) {
-               rcu_read_unlock();
                put_task_struct(victim);
                return;
        } else if (victim != p) {
@@ -490,6 +493,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct
         * That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
         * pending fatal signal.
         */
+       rcu_read_lock();
        for_each_process(p)
                if (p->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(p, victim) &&
                    !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to