On 10/03, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > [ 921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44) > > [ 921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145) > > [ 921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44) > > [ 921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145) > > [ 921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44) > > [ 921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145) > > [ 921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44) > > [ 921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145) > > [ 921.917752] ? ___preempt_schedule_context (arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S:44) > > [ 921.917752] ? preempt_schedule_context (kernel/context_tracking.c:145) > > <snip lots of repeats of this> > > I *think* this is because RBP isn't being saved across task switch > anymore? > > Without CONFIG_FRAME_POINTERS that night not be a problem...
Could you please spell? I don't even understand "RBP isn't being saved", SAVE_CONTEXT/RESTORE_CONTEXT do push/pop %rbp? Thanks, Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
