This patch fix the sparse warnings in wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
The following functions were only used in this file, so done by
declaring them into static.

drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:710:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_connect_result' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:719:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_disconnected' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c:725:6: warning: symbol
'prism2_roamed' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Quentin Lee <lee.rhaps...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c 
b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
index 723319e..9e65429 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/cfg80211.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ exit:
 
 
 /* Interface callback functions, passing data back up to the cfg80211 layer */
-void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t *wlandev, u8 failed)
+static void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t *wlandev, u8 failed)
 {
     u16 status = failed ?
              WLAN_STATUS_UNSPECIFIED_FAILURE : WLAN_STATUS_SUCCESS;
@@ -716,13 +716,13 @@ void prism2_connect_result(wlandevice_t *wlandev, u8 
failed)
                 NULL, 0, NULL, 0, status, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
-void prism2_disconnected(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
+static void prism2_disconnected(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
 {
     cfg80211_disconnected(wlandev->netdev, 0, NULL,
         0, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
-void prism2_roamed(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
+static void prism2_roamed(wlandevice_t *wlandev)
 {
     cfg80211_roamed(wlandev->netdev, NULL, wlandev->bssid,
         NULL, 0, NULL, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to