On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Are we still looking at these options ? I could look at implementing the
> first option which will also enable us to free up one pte bit.
We definitely are. If you can test my patch (with the small follow-up
fix), and do the necessary changes for ppc64, that would be good.
I looked quickly at the ppc64 side, and it didn't look too painful.
Using pte_protnone() instead of pte_numa() should remove move lines
than it adds there too..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
