On (Tue) 07 Oct 2014 [15:53:55], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On restore, virtio pci does the following:
> > + set features
> > + init vqs etc - device can be used at this point!
> > + set ACKNOWLEDGE,DRIVER and DRIVER_OK status bits
> >
> > This is in violation of the virtio spec, which
> > requires the following order:
> > - ACKNOWLEDGE
> > - DRIVER
> > - init vqs
> > - DRIVER_OK
> >
> > This behaviour will break with hypervisors that assume spec compliant
> > behaviour. It seems like a good idea to have this patch applied to
> > stable branches to reduce the support butden for the hypervisors.
>
> Tested suspend to ram with virtio net and blk.
I'd recommend running a continuous ping for virtio-net and a dd
process running across s3/s4 for testing.
That's what I had run while doing the original set of patches.
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
