On 10/08/2014 02:30 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:13 +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 10:26 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:50:46PM +0300, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
@@ -527,10 +538,55 @@ static int pmic8xxx_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+
+ kp->row_hold = devm_regmap_field_alloc(kp->dev, kp->regmap,
+ info->row_hold);
+ if (IS_ERR(kp->row_hold))
+ return PTR_ERR(kp->row_hold);
Why do we have to allocate all regmap fields separately instead of
embedding them into keypad structure?
No particular reason. Will rework it.
Oops. struct regmap_field is opaque. It seems that the allocation
is the only way that I could have instance of it.
Maybe we can add an API to allocate an array of fields?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
