On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:13:36PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> @@ -6214,17 +6178,21 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env
> *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sd
>
> /*
> * In case the child domain prefers tasks go to siblings
> + * first, lower the sg capacity to one so that we'll try
> * and move all the excess tasks away. We lower the capacity
> * of a group only if the local group has the capacity to fit
> + * these excess tasks, i.e. group_capacity > 0. The
> * extra check prevents the case where you always pull from the
> * heaviest group when it is already under-utilized (possible
> * with a large weight task outweighs the tasks on the system).
> */
> if (prefer_sibling && sds->local &&
> + group_has_capacity(env, &sds->local_stat)) {
> + if (sgs->sum_nr_running > 1)
> + sgs->group_no_capacity = 1;
> + sgs->group_capacity = min(sgs->group_capacity,
> + SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
> + }
>
> if (update_sd_pick_busiest(env, sds, sg, sgs)) {
> sds->busiest = sg;
> @@ -6490,8 +6460,8 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct
> lb_env *env)
> goto force_balance;
>
> /* SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE trumps SMP nice when underutilized */
> - if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && local->group_has_free_capacity &&
> - !busiest->group_has_free_capacity)
> + if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && group_has_capacity(env, local) &&
> + busiest->group_no_capacity)
> goto force_balance;
>
> /*
This is two calls to group_has_capacity() on the local group. Why not
compute once in update_sd_lb_stats()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
