On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, DervishD wrote: > Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:17:26 +0200 > From: DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mariusz Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Linux-kernel <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers > > Hi Mariusz :) > > * Mariusz Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > I don't know which set of headers will work, and in fact I don't > > > know if I must follow 'Linux From Scratch' advice and use raw kernel > > > headers for building glibc and LLH headers for any other thing. I > > > think I probably will use the LLH headers (including scsi) for > > > everything since glibc passes the 'make check' doing that... If I > > > screw my system badly, I have lotsa backups at hand. > > Like I've said, you're unable to break your system this way. > > I think so... > > > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel > > headers to compile glibc > > I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale > (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the scsi
http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html seems to have a bearing on what you are discussing - just FYI. -- Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
