On 1 August 2014 22:48, Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 08/01/14 03:27, Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> >> Can you send me the test and the trace of the deadlock? I'm not creating it >> with: >> > > This was with conservative as the default, and switching to ondemand > > # cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq > # ls > affected_cpus scaling_available_governors > conservative scaling_cur_freq > cpuinfo_cur_freq scaling_driver > cpuinfo_max_freq scaling_governor > cpuinfo_min_freq scaling_max_freq > cpuinfo_transition_latency scaling_min_freq > related_cpus scaling_setspeed > scaling_available_frequencies stats > # cat conservative/down_threshold > 20 > # echo ondemand > scaling_governor > > ====================================================== > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] > 3.16.0-rc3-00039-ge1e38f124d87 #47 Not tainted > ------------------------------------------------------- > sh/75 is trying to acquire lock: > (s_active#9){++++..}, at: [<c0358a94>] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3c/0x84
Can you please retry this on mainline? I wasn't able to reproduce it now over 3.17. I am trying this on Exynos b.L implementation.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/