Quoting Richard Guy Briggs (r...@redhat.com):
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |    2 ++
>  kernel/audit.c             |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> index 7ec7209..beb23f7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@
>  
>  #define AUDIT_KERNEL         2000    /* Asynchronous audit record. NOT A 
> REQUEST. */
>  
> +#define AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL   2500    /* Start, Pause, Stop VM */
> +
>  /* Rule flags */
>  #define AUDIT_FILTER_USER    0x00    /* Apply rule to user-generated 
> messages */
>  #define AUDIT_FILTER_TASK    0x01    /* Apply rule at task creation (not 
> syscall) */
> diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> index 84590d1..5404c24 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> @@ -941,6 +941,8 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> nlmsghdr *nlh)
>                       }
>                       audit_set_portid(ab, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
>                       audit_log_end(ab);
> +                     if (msg_type == AUDIT_VIRT_CONTROL)
> +                             audit_log_ns_info(NULL);

AFAICT your patchset leaves audit_log_ns_info() immediately returning if
arg1 is NULL.  Is handling that coming later?  Why not leave this until
that patch comes?

>                       mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
>               }
>               break;
> -- 
> 1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to