> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:10 PM > To: Thomas Shao > Cc: o...@aepfle.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; jasow...@redhat.com; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; a...@canonical.com; > de...@linuxdriverproject.org; t...@linutronix.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hyperv: Implement Time Synchronization using host > time sample > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:50:23PM +0000, Thomas Shao wrote: > > > > -static inline void do_adj_guesttime(u64 hosttime) > > > > +static inline void do_adj_guesttime(u64 hosttime, bool forceSync) > > > > > > I'm surprise checkpatch.pl does't complain about this CamelCase. > > > > I've run the scripts/checkpatch.pl, it didn't complain anything. I'll > > change to > forcesync. > > ->force_sync is normal kernel style.
OK, got it. Thanks Dan! > > regards, > dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
