On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 06:01:43PM +0200, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, it can be faster, even if it is as you say, probably a difference
> depending on the size of the count.
> And even greater need to test this on a variety of hardware :-/
Most architectures (the notable exception is ARM) have an their own
optimized strncpy() function. Probably strzcpy() should just call it.
char *strzcpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count)
{
strncpy(dest, src, count);
if (count)
dest[count - 1] = '\0';
return dest;
}
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
