On Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:36:35 AM Vishnu Pratap Singh wrote:
> This patch replaces printk(KERN_ERR...) with pr_err found.

What is the reason?  Does the existing code cause any problems to happen?

> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Pratap Singh <vishnu...@samsung.com>
> ---
>  kernel/power/process.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index 7b32322..401f7ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int try_to_freeze_tasks(bool user_only)
>  
>       if (todo) {
>               printk("\n");
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "Freezing of tasks %s after %d.%03d seconds "
> +             pr_err("Freezing of tasks %s after %d.%03d seconds "
>                      "(%d tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=%d):\n",
>                      wakeup ? "aborted" : "failed",
>                      elapsed_msecs / 1000, elapsed_msecs % 1000,
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to