On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 16-10-14 09:20:34, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 21:46 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > All memory accounting and limiting has been switched over to the > > > lockless page counters. Bye, res_counter! > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org> > > > Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com> > > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz> > > > > This patch landed in today's linux-next (ie, next 20141016). > > > > > Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt | 197 > > > ------------------------- > > > include/linux/res_counter.h | 223 > > > ----------------------------- > > > init/Kconfig | 6 - > > > kernel/Makefile | 1 - > > > kernel/res_counter.c | 211 > > > --------------------------- > > > 5 files changed, 638 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/cgroups/resource_counter.txt > > > delete mode 100644 include/linux/res_counter.h > > > delete mode 100644 kernel/res_counter.c > > > > There's a last reference to CONFIG_RESOURCE_COUNTERS in > > Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt. That reference could be dropped too, > > couldn't it? > --- > From a54e375e85c814199f480cb4ee7a133a395c5a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz> > Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:15:24 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] kernel-res_counter-remove-the-unused-api-fix > > ditch the last remainings of res_counter > > Reported-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
That makes sense, although that document is still littered with out-of-date and seemingly irrelevant information, which is why I didn't bother to update it. But your patch is still an improvement, we should merge it. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
