On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/16, Cong Wang wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > If a task B is already frozen, it sleeps in D state. >> > >> > If OOM selects B as a victim after that, it won't be woken by >> > SIGKILL, thus it obviously can't call should_thaw_current() and >> > notice TIF_MEMDIE. >> >> I see your point now, it would be more clear if you can just quote >> the patch instead of changelog. >> >> So are you saying the loop in __refrigerator() is useless? > > No. > >> Since >> it will always stay in asleep after schedule()? > > Not always. But it will stay asleep in this particular case.
Hmm, so we still need to wake it up in oom killer: if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) { if (unlikely(frozen(task))) wake_up_state(task, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); I will update the patch if Michal doesn't. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/