On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koski...@iki.fi> wrote: > > Here's one example how it fails: http://marc.info/?l=gcc&m=141349914632010&w=2
Ok, that just looks like a gnu11 bug, then. Not being able to initialize structures because some sub-structure has a volatile member is just pure BS. Has anybody reported this as a gcc bug? That email may be on the gcc list, but I'm not seeing anybody acknowledge it as a bug.. I cannot imagine that anybody sane claims that this is *wanted* behavior from "gnu11". Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/