On 10/21/2014 03:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:22:27PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> Generating a volatile pointer is really not necessary here. This is the only
>>> location where a volatile pointer is being generated for use in asm.
>>>
>>> This commit removes the unnecessary volatile pointer being created.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> Seems sane enough to me.
>
However, it seems like unnecessary churn. Does the volatile hurt in any
way?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
