On 10/21/2014 03:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 04:22:27PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote: >>> Generating a volatile pointer is really not necessary here. This is the only >>> location where a volatile pointer is being generated for use in asm. >>> >>> This commit removes the unnecessary volatile pointer being created. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.pr...@gmail.com> > > Seems sane enough to me. >
However, it seems like unnecessary churn. Does the volatile hurt in any way? -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/