On 10/20/2014 05:56 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
This patch switches Keystone 2 PM code to use Generic PM domains
instead of PM clock domains because of the lack of DT support
for the last.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
---
  .../bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt     |  31 ++++++
  arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig                     |   1 +
  arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c                 | 112 ++++++++++++++-------
  3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt

diff --git 
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt 
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4bbf2aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/ti,keystone-powerdomain.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+* TI Keystone 2 Generic PM Controller
+
+The TI Keystone 2 Generic PM Controller is responsible for Clock gating
+for each controlled IP module.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should be "ti,keystone-powerdomain"
+- #power-domain-cells: Should be 0, see below:
+
+The gpc node is a power-controller as documented by the generic power domain
You renamed gpc but missed to fix the comment ? Pls update it.

+bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt.
+
+Example:
+
+       pm_controller: pm-controller {
+               compatible = "ti,keystone-powerdomain";
+               #power-domain-cells = <0>;
+       };
+
+       netcp: netcp@2090000 {
+               reg = <0x2620110 0x8>;
+               reg-names = "efuse";
+               ...
+               #address-cells = <1>;
+               #size-cells = <1>;
+               ranges;
+               power-domains = <&pm_controller>;
+
+               clocks = <&clkpa>, <&clkcpgmac>, <&chipclk12>;
+               dma-coherent;
+       }
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig
index 98a156a..de43107 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ config ARCH_KEYSTONE
        select COMMON_CLK_KEYSTONE
        select ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
        select ZONE_DMA if ARM_LPAE
+       select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
        help
          Support for boards based on the Texas Instruments Keystone family of
          SoCs.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c 
b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
index ca79dda..d58759d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
@@ -12,69 +12,107 @@
   * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
   */

+#include <linux/clk.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
  #include <linux/pm_clock.h>
+#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>

-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
-static int keystone_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
+
+struct keystone_domain {
+       struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
+       struct device   *dev;
+};
+
+void keystone_pm_domain_attach_dev(struct device *dev)
  {
+       struct clk *clk;
        int ret;
+       int i = 0;

        dev_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);

-       ret = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev);
-       if (ret)
-               return ret;
-
-       ret = pm_clk_suspend(dev);
+       ret = pm_clk_create(dev);
        if (ret) {
-               pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
-               return ret;
+               dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_create failed %d\n", ret);
+               return;
+       };
+
+       while ((clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i++)) && !IS_ERR(clk)) {
+               ret = pm_clk_add_clk(dev, clk);
+               if (ret) {
+                       dev_err(dev, "pm_clk_add_clk failed %d\n", ret);
+                       goto clk_err;
+               };
        }

-       return 0;
+       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
Can we not okkup two seperate callbacks instead of above check ?
I don't like this CONFIG check here. Its slightly better version of
ifdef in middle of the code.

Regards,
Santosh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to