Hi, On 23/10/2014 at 07:53:36 -0500, Brian Vandre wrote : > With all the replies I have gotten it seems like there might not be a good > path forward > with this patch. I am starting to agree with what Daniel Baluta said above > that this doesn't > make the code easier to read. All the other suggestions don't quite fit the > same style > as the rest of the file so it might just be better to leave it. > > This being my first try I thank you all for your input. It has helped me > learn quite a bit. > > Hopefully on the next patch I can fix something a little more meaningful! >
Thank you for your effort anyway. My last comment would be that you don't need a cover letter when sending only one patch. There are plenty of things to fix in the kernel, maybe we can help you find something. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
