On 10/23, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Your code, your rules. ;-) Heh, no. I do not trust my (perverted) taste, I never-never argue with cosmetic issues ;)
Cough... and at the same time I have a small nit. > But given this structure, why not use a for() loop replace the > "goto retry" with an inverted condition and a "return error"? > Maybe something like the following patch? Thanks, Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
