On Sunday 03 April 2005 12:31 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Okay, you obviously have easy access to usb development trees... > Do you think you could just take this patch as a basis and fix > remaining u32 vs pm-message-t in usb? --p
Fixing the "sparse -Wbitwise" messages, and addressing some other behavior changes/bugs that crept in, was the idea. That's already done, but _without_ taking this as a basis (or breaking the sysfs support etc). The patches I sent fix everything I had time to test (just a subset of the dozens of cases previously tested, probably covering the main stuff that got broken) except the non-PCI platform_bus drivers where pm_message_t has discarded essential functionality. (Notably, info about whether device clocks and/or power must be turned off.) Fixing those will be more work than seems reasonable for 2.6.12 kernels. Among other things, there's still a lot of stuff that needs to percolate out to arch trees; designing and testing such fixes takes time, as does percolating it back. - Dave p.s. PCI-express patches don't belong with USB patches. :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
