3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sage Weil <s...@redhat.com>
commit 42383020beb1cfb05f5d330cc311931bc4917a97 upstream.
We check whether transid is already committed via last_trans_committed and
then search through trans_list for pending transactions. If
last_trans_committed is updated by btrfs_commit_transaction after we check
it (there is no locking), we will fail to find the committed transaction
and return EINVAL to the caller. This has been observed occasionally by
ceph-osd (which uses this ioctl heavily).
Fix by rechecking whether the provided transid <= last_trans_committed
after the search fails, and if so return 0.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <s...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <c...@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ int btrfs_wait_for_commit(struct btrfs_r
if (transid <= root->fs_info->last_trans_committed)
goto out;
- ret = -EINVAL;
/* find specified transaction */
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->trans_lock);
list_for_each_entry(t, &root->fs_info->trans_list, list) {
@@ -540,9 +539,16 @@ int btrfs_wait_for_commit(struct btrfs_r
}
}
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->trans_lock);
- /* The specified transaction doesn't exist */
- if (!cur_trans)
+
+ /*
+ * The specified transaction doesn't exist, or we
+ * raced with btrfs_commit_transaction
+ */
+ if (!cur_trans) {
+ if (transid > root->fs_info->last_trans_committed)
+ ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
+ }
} else {
/* find newest transaction that is committing | committed */
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->trans_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
