On 10/27/2014 6:25 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.10.14 15:29, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
On 10/26/2014 9:08 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
This option doesn't exist in upstream kernels, does it? Why not just
make it dtb-y?
CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE is being added one hunk above.:)
Oops:).
I'm not convinced we need a config option just for the sake of
compiling a device tree though.
Alex
Eventually, we would add other device driver selections when
CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE=y. At this point, those drivers are still not ready.
Could you please give me some examples of drivers that would depend on
CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE? I like the current way things work without the need
for such an option, where everything's implemented purely as drivers you
can opt in our out of.
You don't have a CONFIG_ARCH_SB7XX on x86 either, right? ;)
Alex
I am not saying that device drivers need to depend on
CONFIG_ARCH_SEATTLE. I am thinking along the line of an easy way to
enable SOC without having to manually select each of the required
drivers to support the SOC. An example is the "ARCH_VEXPRESS".
Suravee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/