On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014 21:31:32 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 28 October 2014 18:13:09 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > I'd like to apply this patch to my y2038 branch and apply the
> > > other patches that need it on top, unless you want to still submit
> > > it for 3.18.
> >
> > I think I should take these patches for 3.18. We do not create users
> > yet, but it makes it easier for submaintaners to apply stuff which you
> > convert. And it lets me have the whole core lot together with other
> > changes in that area. I create a seperate branch which you can pull
> > from.
>
> Ok, sounds good.
>
> > > Regarding the names, should we then have
> > >
> > > time64_t ktime_get_real_seconds(void);
> > > time64_t ktime_get_seconds(void);
> >
> > I like that one. Moving all the time interfaces to a ktime_ prefix and
> > let the default implementation as CLOCK_MONOTONIC and the others with
> > the added '_real', '_boot' ... describe their CLOCK_WHATEVER property
> > makes it pretty clear.
>
> Good. So you can apply this patch as-is and Heena will get you the
> other one.
Not so much.
Applying patch
timekeeping-added-a-function-to-return-tv_sec-portion-of-ktime_get_real_ts64.patch
patching file include/linux/timekeeping.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 29.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file include/linux/timekeeping.h
patching file kernel/time/timekeeping.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 673.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file kernel/time/timekeeping.c
That one depends on the other one. So I wait for a combo of both from
Heena.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
