* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Please consider pulling,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> The following changes since commit e53f6124af6516cee3063a3072767ee2717ff343:
>
> Merge tag 'perf-urgent-for-mingo' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux into perf/urgent
> (2014-10-24 09:46:36 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
> tags/perf-core-for-mingo
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 8eeeb304ea2714962b10873f72aa7c5e24f5265f:
>
> perf probe: Add --quiet option to suppress output result message
> (2014-10-27 17:16:34 -0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> perf/core improvements and fixes:
>
> User visible:
>
> * 'perf probe' --demangle typo fix and a new --quiet option (Masami Hiramatsu)
So the fix part would be nice to have for perf/urgent I suspect?
> * Fix report -F (abort, in_tx, mispredict, etc) segfaults for sample.data
> files
> without branch info (Jiri Olsa)
Ditto.
> * Don't open the DWARF info multiple times, keeping instead a dwfl handle
> in struct dso, greatly speeding up 'perf report' on powerpc. (Sukadev
> Bhattiprolu)
>
> * Add patch that should have went in a previous patchkit to use global cache
> provided by libunwind (Namhyung Kim)
Given that this is already upstream, is this a required fix for
perf/urgent or can it wait and go into perf/core?
And then the remaining bits should be based on the urgent tree.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
