On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:13:45PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:29:55AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > While you are on it, please fix rtnl_lock_unregistering_all() too?
> 
> Ah, that's hidden someplace else, sure I can do that. Thanks for
> pointing it out.

Here goes..

---
Subject: netdev: Fix sleeping inside wait event
From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Date: Wed Oct 29 17:04:56 CET 2014

rtnl_lock_unregistering*() take rtnl_lock() -- a mutex -- inside a
wait loop. The wait loop relies on current->state to function, but so
does mutex_lock(), nesting them makes for the inner to destroy the
outer state.

Fix this using the new wait_woken() bits.

Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com>
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c       |   10 +++++-----
 net/core/rtnetlink.c |   10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
         */
        struct net *net;
        bool unregistering;
-       DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+       DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
 
+       add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
        for (;;) {
-               prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
-                               TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
                unregistering = false;
                rtnl_lock();
                list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
@@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregis
                if (!unregistering)
                        break;
                __rtnl_unlock();
-               schedule();
+
+               wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
        }
-       finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+       remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
 }
 
 static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -365,11 +365,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(
 {
        struct net *net;
        bool unregistering;
-       DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+       DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
 
+       add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
        for (;;) {
-               prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
-                               TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
                unregistering = false;
                rtnl_lock();
                for_each_net(net) {
@@ -381,9 +380,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(
                if (!unregistering)
                        break;
                __rtnl_unlock();
-               schedule();
+
+               wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
        }
-       finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
+       remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
 }
 
 /**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to