3.2.64-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: David Jander <da...@protonic.nl>

commit 25e924450fcb23c11c07c95ea8964dd9f174652e upstream.

This patch implements the workaround mentioned in ERR005829:

    ERR005829: FlexCAN: FlexCAN does not transmit a message that is enabled to
    be transmitted in a specific moment during the arbitration process.

Workaround: The workaround consists of two extra steps after setting up a
message for transmission:

Step 8: Reserve the first valid mailbox as an inactive mailbox (CODE=0b1000).
If RX FIFO is disabled, this mailbox must be message buffer 0. Otherwise, the
first valid mailbox can be found using the "RX FIFO filters" table in the
FlexCAN chapter of the chip reference manual.

Step 9: Write twice INACTIVE code (0b1000) into the first valid mailbox.

Signed-off-by: David Jander <da...@protonic.nl>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <m...@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -120,7 +120,9 @@
        (FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_BUS | FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_STATE)
 
 /* FLEXCAN interrupt flag register (IFLAG) bits */
-#define FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID              8
+/* Errata ERR005829 step7: Reserve first valid MB */
+#define FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_RESERVED                8
+#define FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID              9
 #define FLEXCAN_IFLAG_BUF(x)           BIT(x)
 #define FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW BIT(7)
 #define FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_WARN     BIT(6)
@@ -313,6 +315,14 @@ static int flexcan_start_xmit(struct sk_
        flexcan_write(can_id, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_id);
        flexcan_write(ctrl, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_ctrl);
 
+       /* Errata ERR005829 step8:
+        * Write twice INACTIVE(0x8) code to first MB.
+        */
+       flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_TX_INACTIVE,
+                     &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_RESERVED].can_ctrl);
+       flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_TX_INACTIVE,
+                     &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_RESERVED].can_ctrl);
+
        kfree_skb(skb);
 
        /* tx_packets is incremented in flexcan_irq */
@@ -751,6 +761,10 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net
                              &regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
        }
 
+       /* Errata ERR005829: mark first TX mailbox as INACTIVE */
+       flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_TX_INACTIVE,
+                     &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_RESERVED].can_ctrl);
+
        /* mark TX mailbox as INACTIVE */
        flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_TX_INACTIVE,
                      &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_ctrl);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to