A 2 line printk makes dmesg output messy, because the second line does not get 
a timestamp.
For example:

[    0.012863] CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1)
[    0.012869] Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024
Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 1024, 2MB 1024, 4MB 1024, 1GB 4
[    0.012958] Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 28K (ffffffff81d86000 - 
ffffffff81d8d000)
[    0.014961] dmar: Host address width 39

V2: Revert change to log level, only fix the newline formatting issue

Signed-off-by: Steven Honeyman <stevenhoney...@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 11 ++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c  |  6 ++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 4b4f78c..fbdd7bf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -494,12 +494,13 @@ void cpu_detect_tlb(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
        if (this_cpu->c_detect_tlb)
                this_cpu->c_detect_tlb(c);
 
-       printk(KERN_INFO "Last level iTLB entries: 4KB %d, 2MB %d, 4MB %d\n"
-               "Last level dTLB entries: 4KB %d, 2MB %d, 4MB %d, 1GB %d\n",
+       pr_info("Last level iTLB entries: 4KB %d, 2MB %d, 4MB %d\n",
                tlb_lli_4k[ENTRIES], tlb_lli_2m[ENTRIES],
-               tlb_lli_4m[ENTRIES], tlb_lld_4k[ENTRIES],
-               tlb_lld_2m[ENTRIES], tlb_lld_4m[ENTRIES],
-               tlb_lld_1g[ENTRIES]);
+               tlb_lli_4m[ENTRIES]);
+
+       pr_info("Last level dTLB entries: 4KB %d, 2MB %d, 4MB %d, 1GB %d\n",
+               tlb_lld_4k[ENTRIES], tlb_lld_2m[ENTRIES],
+               tlb_lld_4m[ENTRIES], tlb_lld_1g[ENTRIES]);
 }
 
 void detect_ht(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 9cc6b6f..94d7dcb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -487,10 +487,8 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 
                rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
                if ((epb & 0xF) == ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_PERFORMANCE) {
-                       printk_once(KERN_WARNING "ENERGY_PERF_BIAS:"
-                               " Set to 'normal', was 'performance'\n"
-                               "ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with"
-                               " x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n");
+                       pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 
'performance'\n");
+                       pr_warn_once("ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with 
x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n");
                        epb = (epb & ~0xF) | ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL;
                        wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb);
                }
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to