On 03/11/14 09:39, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com> wrote: >> On 03/11/14 09:27, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>> The dsos__hit_all() and its friends are not used anywhere. Let's get >>> rid of them. >> >> They were added for Intel PT preparation. Intel PT is still on its way, >> so they are still needed. Note the commit was: >> >> commit 1f625b0b3dd641b74ba21640a1fea19a3dd893a2 >> Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com> >> Date: Tue Jul 22 16:17:23 2014 +0300 >> >> perf tools: Add dsos__hit_all() >> >> Add ability to mark all dsos as hit. >> >> This is needed in the case of Instruction Tracing. It takes so long to >> decode an Instruction Trace that it is not worth doing just to determine >> which dsos are hit. A later patch takes this into use. > > Oops, didn't notice. Sorry for not checking the commit log. So how > about moving it into util/build-id.c then?
OK by me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
