Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I run the test(20 instances of fsx) with your patch on 2.6.12-rc1 with > 512MB RAM (where I were able to constantly re-create the mem leak and > lead to OOM before). The result is the kernel did not get into OOM after > about 19 hours(before it took about 9 hours or so), system is still > responsive. However I did notice about ~60MB delta between Active > +Inactive and Buffers+cached+Swapcached+Mapped+Slab
yes. Nobody has noticed the now-fixed leak since 2.6.6 and this one appears to be 100x slower. Which is fortunate because this one is going to take a long time to fix. I'll poke at it some more. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
