We use the same set of checks in both memcg_kmem_newpage_charge and
memcg_kmem_get_cache, and I need it in yet another function, which will
be introduced by one of the following patches. So let's introduce a
helper function for it.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 617652712da8..224c045fd37f 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -416,6 +416,26 @@ void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);
 struct kmem_cache *
 __memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp);
 
+static __always_inline bool memcg_kmem_should_charge(gfp_t gfp)
+{
+       /*
+        * __GFP_NOFAIL allocations will move on even if charging is not
+        * possible. Therefore we don't even try, and have this allocation
+        * unaccounted. We could in theory charge it forcibly, but we hope
+        * those allocations are rare, and won't be worth the trouble.
+        */
+       if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)
+               return false;
+       if (in_interrupt())
+               return false;
+       if (!current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+               return false;
+       /* If the test is dying, just let it go. */
+       if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+               return false;
+       return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * memcg_kmem_newpage_charge: verify if a new kmem allocation is allowed.
  * @gfp: the gfp allocation flags.
@@ -433,22 +453,8 @@ memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup 
**memcg, int order)
 {
        if (!memcg_kmem_enabled())
                return true;
-
-       /*
-        * __GFP_NOFAIL allocations will move on even if charging is not
-        * possible. Therefore we don't even try, and have this allocation
-        * unaccounted. We could in theory charge it forcibly, but we hope
-        * those allocations are rare, and won't be worth the trouble.
-        */
-       if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)
-               return true;
-       if (in_interrupt() || (!current->mm) || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
-               return true;
-
-       /* If the test is dying, just let it go. */
-       if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+       if (!memcg_kmem_should_charge(gfp))
                return true;
-
        return __memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp, memcg, order);
 }
 
@@ -491,13 +497,8 @@ memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
 {
        if (!memcg_kmem_enabled())
                return cachep;
-       if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)
-               return cachep;
-       if (in_interrupt() || (!current->mm) || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
-               return cachep;
-       if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+       if (!memcg_kmem_should_charge(gfp))
                return cachep;
-
        return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
 }
 #else
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to